The Victorian government has identified waste-to-energy incineration as part of its long-term waste strategy.
A facility has been proposed for Sunbury Rd, Bulla, and the planning process is underway by Eco-Hub operator HiQ (formerly Hi-Quality).
Supporters argue these plants reduce landfill and generate electricity. Opponents say they create pollution, increase truck traffic, and undermine genuine recycling. These types of facilities are already banned in the ACT due to health concerns.
Cast your vote in our poll and let us know what you think.
(This is a community sentiment survey, not a scientific poll.)
Read all our reports on the proposed waste incinerator and power generator here.
| Feature | ACT | Victoria |
|---|---|---|
| Waste to energy policy | Banned – No thermal incineration, gasification, or pyrolysis allowed | Allowed – Licensed thermal WtE plants under strict regulation |
| Focus | Recycling, composting, anaerobic digestion | Energy recovery, WtE, recycling |
| Health & Environmental Risk | High concern – toxic emissions, dioxins, ash | Managed via licensing and caps, but emissions remain a concern |
| Community Input | Strong opposition influenced policy | Local communities often overruled by government policy |
| Property & Liveability Impact | Avoided risk | Potential negative effects near plants |
| Policy Goal | Zero-waste, circular economy | Reduce landfill, generate energy from waste |
Takeaway:
- The ACT shows it’s possible to reject incineration and focus on safe, clean alternatives.
- Victoria’s approach exposes communities to potential pollution and property risk while locking in waste-burning infrastructure.
Click here to read the (PDF) waste-to-energy policy adopted by the ACT.